Archive for December, 2008
Start a process on resume from S3
Dec 29th
When you want to run an application when resume your PC from stand-by, you can follow the following procedure:
- Open task sheduler [press windows key, type task, click on task scheduler at the top of the menu list]
- In Actions [menu or right pane] click ‘new task’
- In General tab, give your task a name
- In Trigger tab, click ‘new’
- Choose ‘on an event’ in the top drop-down list.
- Choose ‘custom’ radio button
- Click on the ‘new event filter’ button that now appears.
- For event level, choose ‘information’
- In ‘event logs’ drop-down menu, choose windows logs > system. Put a tick next to ’system’ only
- Click on the text ‘All event ID’s’ [the text will clear] and insert 1
- Click ok
- In the ‘Actions’ tab, choose the program you want to start by clicking ‘new’
- In the ‘new action’ window, use the browse button to navigate to the .exe of the program you want to run. If you have a shortcut on your desktop for the program, you can simply choose that and scheduler will extract the path from the shortcut.
- [optional] Add -fullscreen to the ‘arguments’ box if you want your program to start full screen and it supports this switch [argument]
Car makers want $25 bln – Bad idea!
Dec 4th
The bosses of the three biggest US carmakers, Ford, GM and Chrysler, have asked Congress for a $25bn bail-out. They told a Senate hearing that without the rescue package, their firms risked collapse, and warned of broader risks to the US economy. Ford’s CEO Mulally has committed to reducing his own salary to $1/year IF Ford receives the requested $9 billion line of credit.
The CEO’s claim that the credit crisis should be blamed for these companies having a hard time. But is that really true? Could it be that the American car companies have been badly run for decades? It seems that they have been emphasizing marketing over products. Yes, it’s difficult for anyone to compete with Toyota, but the relative success of three Japanese companies, two Korean companies, three German companies and even Renault demonstrates that Detroit’s problems are entirely self-inflicted.
Paul Ingrassia, former Detroit bureau chief of the Wall Street Journal, has an authoritative discussion of these self-inflicted problems this morning, entitled “How Detroit Drove Into a Ditch.” One excerpt:
In all this lies a tale of hubris, missed opportunities, disastrous decisions and flawed leadership of almost biblical proportions. In fact, for the last 30 years Detroit has gone astray, repented, gone astray and repented again in a cycle not unlike the Israelites in the Book of Exodus.
What it comes down to is that US car companies couldn’t produce the cars that customers want for a price that customers want to buy them for. Not only during the credit crisis, but even many years before. Foreign car makers have been able to fill that gap, even with cars produced in the US, under the same US labour laws that apply to the big three. Note that this lack of sight for what the customer wants has been covered up for a long time with what Wendelin Wiedeking (CEO of Porsche) described as “ruinous discounts and hugely subsidised leasing rates“.
So why shouldn’t the US government chip in to save the US car industry:
- The US car industry doesn’t only consist of GM, Crysler and Ford alone. Paying their bills would be unfair to the other manufacturers that have setup production facilities in the US. In fact, these three Detroit-based companies combined no longer control the lion’s share of the American automotive market. Foreign-owned manufacturers account for over 50 percent of all new vehicle sales within the U.S. For better or worse, they constitute the core of the American automobile industry.
- Using tax money to protect Ford, GM and Chrysler from their own incompetence will not benefit the U.S. car industry, or even these three companies. A federal bailout for Ford, GM and Chrysler would simply prolong the automakers’ – and their workers’ – agony. Ford, GM and Chrysler will have to shed jobs anyway. Bailout or no bailout.
In my opinion the better options are:
- Get the management of these companies to return a seriously large part of their undeserved bonusses of the last few years, maybe even decade. They are the only ones that can be blamed for mismanagement. Even though they might have so-called “deserved” their bonusses by making short-term goals, obviously they missed out on the really important long-term goals. And do note that their total earning are ~20 mln per CEO!
- Remove the management of these companies. They have shown their incompetence for decades and it it time to clear up the mess they have left. Perhaps have a couple of hedge funds to take majority control and maybe even have foreign or Japanese talent, to replace the management.
- Evaluate the constituent brands within the 3 companies, reconstitute the healthy brands as independent car companies and get rid of the unhealthy ones.
And if the US government, for one reason or another, still decides to grant the detroit car makers this loan, the US government should maken sure that it gets a large stake in these companies. And once it has this stake make the above still happen.
There will be pain. Lots and lots of pain. But sometimes the more painful the mistake, the more important the lesson. This is one of those times. Detroit can not be saved from the reality that they’ve studiously, callously, stubbornly ignored. Nor should they be.
Powered by non-sequitur.com
